As water applied for irrigation flows to surface streams or percolates
into the ground, it may carry with it residual contaminants such
as nutrients or pesticides that had been applied to the crop. Runoff from
irrigated lands is subject to regulation by regional water boards since
the runoff (including percolation to groundwater) carries various contaminants
to the receiving stream or aquifer. In the past, most regional water boards
covered these discharges under a blanket waiver which provided a
broad exemption from further regulation. These earlier waivers, in most,
if not all cases, acknowledged the existence of a water quality problem
from irrigation runoff but required no active measures on the part of the
grower.
Only recently have the California Regional Water Quality Control
Boards begun to make their irrigated agriculture waivers more stringent.
This was prompted by new legislation that required each regional
board to reconsider the status of existing waivers it had issued in the
past and to renew those waivers or let them lapse. Had the waivers been
allowed to lapse, individual permits from each potential source would have
been required.
Each regional water board has taken a different approach to controlling
runoff from agricultural lands. Currently, four of the nine regional boards have
each adopted what is called a "conditional waiver" or "conditional
Ag waiver" for irrigation runoff. The conditional waiver allows
the discharge to occur but growers are required to take specific actions.
Monitoring of waters downstream of the source of irrigated lands is a key
component of these waivers. Monitoring is accomplished through participation
in monitoring coalitions or groups to provide more cost effective results
although the opportunity exists for individual growers to act independent
of any group.
Conditional Ag waivers are formally known as Conditional Waiver of
Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from Irrigated Lands. Despite
its long title, the waiver’s key concept is straightforward. The
conditional Ag waiver allows the Regional Board to get more information
on water quality; identify exactly where the pollutants are coming from;
and determine why established tolerances are being exceeded. The
conditional Ag waiver requires potential contributors of the pollutants
(which could be growers) to adopt in-field measures, known as Best Management
Practices (BMPs), to prevent pollutants from finding their way into streams,
rivers and groundwater.
The Central Valley Regional Water Board was the
first to adopt this new approach that relies on increased monitoring
of surface waters to verify that no adverse water quality effects are occurring
from runoff associated with irrigated agriculture in July 2003.
The Central Coast Regional Water Board adopted a similar conditional waiver
in July 2004 and the Los Angeles Regional Water board in November 2005. The
latter has jurisdiction over growers in Los Angeles as well as Ventura
County. San
Diego was the latest to adopt a conditional waiver in January 2008.
The San Diego Regional Water board began developing a new conditional
Ag waiver in late 2006. Prior
to the adoption of the new waiver, San Diego already had one in place
but it is not one of the "newer" versions that require grower
registration. On March 27, 2008 the San Diego Farm Bureau held a workshop
to provide better understanding of water quality runoff management and
inform growers about the new irrigated agricultural waiver and how it
will affect your operation. The
California Avocado Commission will continue to closely watch and
provide updates on this and other conditional waivers on this website.
Follow the links below to read about the three California conditional
Ag waiver programs.